Robot rights: for what purpose ought to Associate in Nursing intelligent machine be thought-about a ‘person’?

In science fiction, I often see that robots are able to think themselves and decide on their own. Sometimes people are benefitting from the people and are struggling again against the people. If it is such that robots can think like this in the real world, they can decide on their own, then what kind of complexity will be born? Already last year the meeting was held in the European parliament. There has been a proposal to make a law regarding robots. With the help of the law, it will be possible to bring an intellectual robot or an "electronic person" under the law. As long as the robots are getting better than they are. These are no longer just a machine or machine. A robot has emerged in the upper queue than the ordinary device being artificial intelligence.

Robots intelligence

If there is a technical error in the general robot, then that robbery takes over the production company. But the robots that are artificially intelligent, can adapt themselves to the information from the surroundings of the environment, or work on their own decisions according to the situation; If any damage was done by them, who will take responsibility for it? Only programming software cannot be blamed. Because of the artificial intelligence, the programming has become rugged and complex. It is unfair to blame the manufacturing company on a robot where a robot is defective or harming himself. And that's exactly where the robot needs to be judged as an electronic device, the need to judge as an 'electronic person' has been created. The robot's owner and robot himself will be responsible for the activities of the robot.

Advanced computer patron Alan Turing had long offered a kind of test, where a meritorious person and an intelligent computer would be kept face-to-face and would be seen if the computer could fool the person by answering different questions and making counter-questions. In the meantime, the plan to test such a test seems to be a fantasy, but today it is not a fantasy.

Already some computer software has been created which can add sound to the video file itself, and that word is so perfect and realistic that anybody is bound to be fooled. A robot has been created that can resolve the captcha of different websites. There is another robot that can simulate human handwriting exactly. There is also a robot that has lost some of the world's best players in the insect game. Thinking?

Human and machine

It is not the end here, the robots in front will be programmed in such a way that they can feel pain and pain until pain. And if this continues to happen, it would be impossible to count the robot as a mere device, it is necessary to say that. South Korea's Peking University's Ewe-Queen said that by 2030 people will start living in the world of robots. Japan's Ministry of Finance has already made policy-makers in relation to the operation of robots.

Now the question remains if the robot is not considered a machine, then what will be considered as a person? What will be their status in the country? If the robots are truly intellectually and sensual like humans, they are able to get different rights as humans. For example, earning money, taking and leaving jobs for themselves, paying taxes, working according to work hours, getting legal assistance etc. A vote in the European Parliament will be held in this regard. Regardless of the outcome of the voting, due to such robust rights in the near future, there is a lot of complexity in the system of computer science and insurance policy as well as the entire legal system.

What is your opinion regarding the writing?


Please Like Comment and share.